5- Issue or pass any order as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Brief controversy, which emerges out from the facts of the case, is that by the impugned Notifications during Kumbh Mela period, mining and stone crushing activities were restrained by the State Government.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has allowed the writ petitions by a common judgment dated 14.05.2007. The State of Uttarakhand and State of Uttar Pradesh has filed SLPs, in which leave has been granted, challenging the judgments of the High Courts in so far as writ petitions filed by the writ petitioners were allowed.

Get free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …

It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 63. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed.

Haldwani indicated that the stone crushers are located in the vicinity of residential houses and those are causing air and noise pollution in the surrounding areas.

Harlan Fiske Stone is the only Justice to have occupied every seat on the Supreme Court Bench. Nominated by President Calvin Coolidge to be an Associate Justice, Stone was quickly confirmed and took his seat at the right end of the Bench in 1925. Over the next 16 years, his seat alternated from side to side as he rose in seniority to become the ...

The Supreme Court has now considerably liberalized the rule of Locus Standi where a social worker or jurist can file a case before the court on behalf of the public or society who's Constitutional, or legal …

Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.

Initially the petitioners filed the writ petition on 20.12.2010 seeking, besides other prayers, to command the official respondents to restrain the private respondent from operating the stone crusher and extracting stones from the nallah bed, which petition later on came to be registered as a Public Interest Litigation vide order dated 13.12.2017.

in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru . dated this the 26 th day of april, 2019 . present . the hon'ble mr. l. narayana swamy, acting chief justice . and . the hon'ble mr. justice p.s.dinesh kumar . writ petition 8349 of 2019 (gm-mm-s) between: m/s vigneshwara stone crusher, represented by its prop. b. shivalinga,

Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004 (M/S), Ms. Gupta Builders v. State of Uttaranchal. In view of the aforesaid judgment, no transit fees can be levied on the petitioner under the Forest Act.

State Of Uttaranchal And Others v. Kumaon Stone Crusher . Smart Summary (Beta) Facts: The High Court had previously held Rule 5 to be constitutionally valid but invalidated the levy of transit fee due to the absence of quid pro quo.

5. p and a stone crusher unit trade name. jai balaji stone crusher unit, having its registered office at. no.001, jayashree building, shanti colony south, vidya nagar, hubli, dharwad - 580 021. 6. mr. abhinav patil, s/o chandrakant patil, partner, p and a stone crusher unit trade name. jai balaji stone crusher unit. 7. mr. sanket, s/o shrinath ...

In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment dated 26-6-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004(M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by District Magistrate, Sonbhadra's order dated 20.05.2017 whereby referring to this Court's interim order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 18769 of 2017 (All India Kaimoor Peoples Front v.State of U.P), he has directed …

It held that the character of Forest Produce is not lost by such crushing of the stone. High Court of Uttarakhand has taken a contrary view in its judgment dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supra), as noted above. 63. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners have relied on few judgments of this Court which need to be noticed.

To save the Delhi ridge from destruction an order from the Supreme Court was obtained directing NCT of Delhi to declare it as 'Reserved Forest'. DUST POLLUTION CASE: In a historic case, 212 stone crushers were shifted out of Delhi to a 'Crushing Zone' set up in Haryana by an order of the Supreme Court on May 15th, 1992.

(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).

in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru . dated this the 26 th day of april, 2019 . present . the hon'ble mr. l. narayana swamy, acting chief justice . and . the hon'ble mr. justice p.s.dinesh kumar . writ petition 8345 of 2019 (gm-mm-s) between: m/s k.k. stone crusher, represented. by sadiq ulla khan, aged about 32 years,

in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru . dated this the 26 th day of april, 2019 . present . the hon'ble mr. l. narayana swamy . acting chief justice . and . the hon'ble mr.justice p.s. dinesh kumar . writ petition 8354 of 2019 (gm-mms) between: m/s. leelambari stone crusher . represented by its proprietor . smt. r.mallika

in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru . dated this the 26 th day of april, 2019 . present . the hon'ble mr. l. narayana swamy, acting chief justice . and . the hon'ble mr. justice p.s.dinesh kumar . writ petition 8350 of 2019 (gm-mm-s) between: m/s. c.a. stone crusher, represented by its prop. p.m. kunji ahamad, aged about 59 years,

Get free access to the complete judgment in Slv Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Slv Stone Crusher v. State Of Karnataka on CaseMine. Log In. India; ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.

A progress report in this respect should be sent to the Registry of this Court before July 31, 1992. [360 B-C, E-H, 361 A-G] 3. Some Writ Petitions, which were filled by the owners/proprietors of stone-crushers in the Delhi High Court and which have been directed to be transferred to this Court are dismissed. [360 E] JUDGMENT:

LTD v EASTERN STONE CRUSHERS LTD 2017 SCJ 110 Record No SC/COM/MOT/00692/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) In the matter of: Cimix Construction Co Ltd Applicant v/s Eastern Stone Crushers Ltd Respondent JUDGMENT This is an application moving that the …

Union Of India And Others Supreme Court Of India Nov 16, 1999; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) ... Out of 98 stone-crusher owners, only 15 stone-crusher owners had raised construction of one-room tenements of residential plots. ... This amounts to violation of various directions issued by this Court in its judgment …

2020-21/462 passed by 8th Respondent in Revision Petition No.61/2018-19; (b) ISSUE an order, direction, Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 22.11.2012 passed by the 3rd Respondent vide ANNEXURE-. A and the consequent order Dated 30.01.2013 vide ANNEXURE-B bearing No. GabuE:HibuMa:

The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Revenue. Accordingly, all the questions are answered in favour of the assessee and against the …

The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to Section 3 of 1949 Act, observed that, the stone crushing activities carried out by those other than mine owners and at a distinct place than the mine are not …

Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.

stone crusher judgement. supreme court judgement for stone crusher. supreme court judgement on stone crushers supreme court judgement for stone crusher; organized by chief justice